• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

What is Free Evolution?

Free evolution is the notion that the natural processes of organisms can lead them to evolve over time. This includes the appearance and development of new species.

A variety of examples have been provided of this, such as different kinds of stickleback fish that can live in either salt or fresh water, and walking stick insect varieties that are attracted to particular host plants. These reversible traits are not able to explain fundamental changes to the basic body plan.

Evolution by Natural Selection

Scientists have been fascinated by the development of all the living creatures that inhabit our planet for many centuries. The most widely accepted explanation is Darwin's natural selection, which occurs when individuals that are better adapted survive and reproduce more successfully than those who are less well-adapted. Over time, a population of well-adapted individuals increases and eventually forms a whole new species.

Natural selection is a cyclical process that involves the interaction of three factors including inheritance, variation, and reproduction. Mutation and sexual reproduction increase the genetic diversity of the species. Inheritance is the transfer of a person's genetic traits to his or her offspring that includes recessive and dominant alleles. Reproduction is the process of producing viable, fertile offspring. This can be accomplished by both asexual or sexual methods.

All of these factors must be in balance to allow natural selection to take place. For instance, if an allele that is dominant at a gene can cause an organism to live and reproduce more often than the recessive allele, the dominant allele will be more common in the population. If the allele confers a negative survival advantage or reduces the fertility of the population, it will go away. The process is self-reinforcing, which means that an organism with a beneficial trait is more likely to survive and reproduce than one with an unadaptive characteristic. The more offspring that an organism has, 에볼루션 사이트 the greater its fitness, which is measured by its capacity to reproduce itself and live. People with desirable traits, like longer necks in giraffes, or bright white patterns of color in male peacocks, are more likely to survive and produce offspring, and thus will make up the majority of the population in the future.

Natural selection only acts on populations, not individual organisms. This is a major distinction from the Lamarckian theory of evolution which states that animals acquire traits by use or inactivity. For example, if a animal's neck is lengthened by stretching to reach for prey and 에볼루션 바카라사이트 its offspring will inherit a more long neck. The differences in neck size between generations will continue to increase until the giraffe is no longer able to reproduce with other giraffes.

Evolution by Genetic Drift

In genetic drift, the alleles within a gene can be at different frequencies in a population due to random events. At some point, only one of them will be fixed (become common enough that it can no longer be eliminated by natural selection), and the rest of the alleles will decrease in frequency. This could lead to an allele that is dominant in extreme. The other alleles are eliminated, and heterozygosity decreases to zero. In a small number of people it could lead to the complete elimination of recessive alleles. This is known as a bottleneck effect and it is typical of evolutionary process when a large number of people migrate to form a new population.

A phenotypic 'bottleneck' can also occur when the survivors of a disaster like an outbreak or mass hunt event are concentrated in a small area. The remaining individuals are likely to be homozygous for the dominant allele, which means they will all have the same phenotype, 에볼루션 사이트 and consequently have the same fitness traits. This situation might be caused by conflict, earthquake or even a disease. Whatever the reason the genetically distinct group that remains is prone to genetic drift.

Walsh Lewens, Lewens, and Ariew employ a "purely outcome-oriented" definition of drift as any deviation from the expected values for different fitness levels. They provide the famous case of twins who are genetically identical and share the same phenotype. However, one is struck by lightning and dies, but the other lives to reproduce.

This type of drift is very important in the evolution of an entire species. It's not the only method for evolution. Natural selection is the main alternative, in which mutations and migration maintain the phenotypic diversity of a population.

Stephens argues there is a huge distinction between treating drift as a force or cause, and considering other causes, such as migration and selection as causes and forces. He argues that a causal-process explanation of drift lets us distinguish it from other forces, and this distinction is crucial. He further argues that drift is both direction, i.e., it tends to reduce heterozygosity. It also has a size that is determined by the size of the population.

Evolution by Lamarckism

When high school students study biology, they are often introduced to the work of Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744 - 1829). His theory of evolution is commonly known as "Lamarckism" and it asserts that simple organisms evolve into more complex organisms through the inheritance of characteristics that are a result of the natural activities of an organism use and misuse. Lamarckism can be illustrated by an giraffe's neck stretching to reach higher leaves in the trees. This could cause giraffes to pass on their longer necks to offspring, who would then get taller.

Lamarck, a French Zoologist, introduced an innovative idea in his opening lecture at the Museum of Natural History of Paris. He challenged the conventional wisdom on organic transformation. According to Lamarck, living things evolved from inanimate materials by a series of gradual steps. Lamarck wasn't the only one to propose this but he was considered to be the first to give the subject a thorough and general treatment.

The dominant story is that Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection and Lamarckism fought in the 19th century. Darwinism eventually prevailed and led to the development of what biologists today call the Modern Synthesis. This theory denies acquired characteristics can be passed down and instead argues organisms evolve by the influence of environment factors, such as Natural Selection.

While Lamarck supported the notion of inheritance through acquired characters and his contemporaries offered a few words about this idea but it was not a major feature in any of their evolutionary theorizing. This is partly due to the fact that it was never tested scientifically.

It's been more than 200 years since Lamarck was born and, in the age of genomics there is a huge body of evidence supporting the possibility of inheritance of acquired traits. This is also known as "neo Lamarckism", or more commonly epigenetic inheritance. It is a version of evolution that is just as valid as the more popular neo-Darwinian model.

Evolution through adaptation

One of the most common misconceptions about evolution is that it is a result of a kind of struggle to survive. This is a false assumption and overlooks other forces that drive evolution. The fight for survival can be more accurately described as a struggle to survive within a particular environment, which may include not just other organisms but as well the physical environment.

To understand how evolution functions, it is helpful to understand what is adaptation. The term "adaptation" refers to any specific feature that allows an organism to survive and reproduce in its environment. It could be a physiological feature, such as fur or feathers, or a behavioral trait, such as moving into the shade in hot weather or stepping out at night to avoid cold.

The capacity of an organism to draw energy from its environment and interact with other organisms and their physical environment, 에볼루션 무료 바카라 바카라 무료, https://bbs.airav.cc/home.php?mod=space&Uid=2375742, is crucial to its survival. The organism should possess the right genes to create offspring and to be able to access enough food and resources. The organism must also be able reproduce at an amount that is appropriate for its particular niche.

These factors, along with mutation and gene flow can result in an alteration in the percentage of alleles (different forms of a gene) in a population's gene pool. The change in frequency of alleles can result in the emergence of novel traits and eventually new species over time.

Many of the features that we admire about animals and plants are adaptations, for example, lung or gills for removing oxygen from the air, fur or feathers to provide insulation, long legs for running away from predators and camouflage to hide. To understand adaptation it is essential to differentiate between physiological and behavioral traits.

Physiological traits like large gills and thick fur are physical traits. The behavioral adaptations aren't like the tendency of animals to seek companionship or move into the shade in hot weather. Additionally, it is important to understand that a lack of thought is not a reason to make something an adaptation. Failure to consider the effects of a behavior even if it seems to be logical, can cause it to be unadaptive.