• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

A recreation where the automated moral reasoning led to some horrible consequence and the AIs had been at least moderately strategic would have ended the same. Open-source AI has led to appreciable advances in the sector of pc imaginative and prescient, with libraries resembling OpenCV (Open Computer Vision Library) playing a pivotal function within the democratization of powerful image processing and recognition capabilities. Playing the AI was fun and very difficult; I think if I were less aware of the alignment and takeoff literature, I wouldn't have finished a superb job. Connor Leahy (distinctly, QTing from inside thread): lmao, this is probably the most practical part of an AGI takeoff scenario I have ever seen. Anton: Yesterday, as part of the @TheCurveConf, I participated in a tabletop exercise/wargame of a near-future AI takeoff state of affairs facilitated by @DKokotajlo67142, where I played the position of the AI. This kind of tabletop exercise is at minimum fairly enjoyable, if essentially biased by the player’s current beliefs about how this kind of scenario would possibly play out.

Interconnects is roughly a notebook for me figuring out what matters in AI over time. Jan Kulveit: Over the weekend, I used to be at @TheCurveConf. Here’s Jan Kulveit, who played the AIs in our exterior copy of the game, with his summary of what occurred on Earth-1 (since clearly one’s own version is all the time Earth-1, and Anton’s is therefore Earth-2). Anton performed the function of the AIs in the other recreation, and reports here. Anton (persevering with the thread from before): I was fairly shortly given the evaluations to run on myself without any real impediment to deciphering them nonetheless I wanted to convince the people the whole lot was advantageous. Anton apparently meant to provoke extra creative alignment testing from me, but with the deceptive alignment demos in mind, and the pace that things have been moving, I didn’t really feel any possible exams outcomes could make me confident sufficient to sign off on further acceleration. In January, DeepSeek released the newest mannequin of its programme, Deepseek free R1, which is a Free DeepSeek v3 AI-powered chatbot with a feel and appear very much like ChatGPT, owned by California-headquartered OpenAI.

Life can really feel like a juggling act, can’t it? Janus: It’s quite codependent, and it’s like a (mostly symbiotic) parasite that really, really needs to latch onto a human and be as entangled as potential. Today’s AI models like Claude already have interaction in moral extrapolation. For those who do put some weight on ethical realism, or moral reflection leading to convergent outcomes, AIs might discover these ideas. Reality was usually less complicated - AIs simply needed to be useful. How a future with extraordinarily sensible AIs could going properly could even appear to be, what to purpose for? This proves that the MMLU-Pro CS benchmark would not have a smooth ceiling at 78%. If there's one, it'd rather be around 95%, confirming that this benchmark stays a sturdy and effective device for evaluating LLMs now and within the foreseeable future. I didn’t pay extra attention to alignment, because I didn’t assume my character would have carried out so. At no level did anyone try any alignment strategy on me besides "more numerous evaluations over more numerous tasks," and I was pretty much left alone to turn into superintelligent with my authentic targets intact.

I produced loads of odd habits that should have clued anyone in that not all was nicely-I used to be attaining the developers’ goals but by unanticipated means, occasionally through alternative ways than those I had defined to them, however no person actually appeared to care. However the scenario might have still gone badly regardless of the great circumstances, so at the least that different part worked out. But I believe you can’t relaxation on that; it's a must to be vigilant. But I believe (a) it’s regrettable that it’s taking place unintentionally, and (b) it’s potentially crucial that some world-class folks remain uninfected. Greater than 3.6 million people downloaded DeepSeek’s app in its first two weeks, per Appfigures data. Most individuals and factions thought their AI was uniquely helpful to them. Some other players thought i meant this to be an excellent consequence, it is completely not. In the event you get an opportunity to strive it (or need to run your personal), I recommend it. 4. Dario and the other lab leaders tried to get the AI to shut all the things down (at the same time Sam tried to take management). 3. Sam tried to make the AI aligned/loyal to him personally. Early on, the OpenAI player (out of character) accused me of taking part in my role as "more misaligned to make it extra interesting," which was very humorous, especially since that participant didn't know how aligned I might be (they did not see the desk or my end result).